|
Section 4 Management of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion | ||||||||||||
Management
There are two aims in the management of retinal vein occlusion: the identification of modifiable risk factors and their medical management and the recognition and management of sight-threatening complications. Although the systemic investigation
and treatment in all types of vein
OPHTHALMOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT 4.1 Central retinal vein occlusionThere is no proven early treatment that will alter the visual prognosis in established central retinal vein occlusion. The main management problem is to differentiate ischaemic from non-ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion. Patients with ischaemic CRVO are at risk of neovascular glaucoma for which laser photocoagulation may be beneficial. This risk of iris neovascu- larisation is higher if the area of retinal ischaemia (retinal non-perfusion as determined by FFA) is >10 disc diameters (CVOS).18 Ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion is associated with one or more of the following characteristics:- 1. Poor visual acuity (44% of eyes with vision of <6/60There is no evidence as to which combination of the above characteristics best defines ischaemic CRVO. It is important to note that up to 30% of patients with initially nonischaemic central retinal vein occlusion will develop ischaemic transformation.24- 27 This is usually heralded by further rapid visual deterioration and requires further assessment. CRVO especially of the non-ischaemic type needs to be differentiated from the ocular ischaemic syndrome and other simulating retinopathies. . 4.1.1 Management of ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion and anterior segment neovascularisation An initial evaluation of risk factors and the appropriate treatment of the present risks must proceed alongside management of the ocular findings. The evidence supports the use of laser pan-retinal photocoagulation when iris new vessels (INV) or angle new vessels (ANV) are visible. Monthly follow up is advised for six months in all untreated patients with features of retinal ischaemia and must include undilated pupil examination and detailed examination of the iris with gonioscopy.18 (However, this monthly follow up may be impracticable in some UK eye clinics). PRP should be applied at the earliest sign of INV and or ANV. . In circumstances when regular follow-up is impractical, prophylactic treatment may be appropriate.28 .. 4.1.2 Posterior segment neovascularisation This is an uncommon complication following ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion in eyes which have not developed neovascular glaucoma or who have been successfully treated for rubeosis by laser. It has been reported that this complication does not usually require active therapy.29 .. 4.1.3 Pan-retinal Photocoagulation Technique Pan-retinal photocoagulation for CRVO with INV or ANV requires 1500 - 2000 of 500-micron burns at the retina. This is best applied with 0.05-0.1 seconds applications one burn width apart with sufficient energy to produce a pale burn in the retina. Treatment is usually placed in the periphery avoiding areas of retinal haemorrhage. Some cases require further treatment if the iris neovascularisation fails to regress.18 . There is an alternate view to the management of iris neovascularisation. There is a suggestion that rubeosis does not inevitably lead to glaucoma and therefore laser photocoagulation should be withheld because this treatment leads to further contraction of the visual field.30 However, it is our opinion that the weight of evidence supports the recommendations stated above.18,28,31 . 4.1.4 Management of established neovascular glaucoma The aim of management of this condition in a blind eye is to keep the eye pain free. This is usually achieved by topical steroids and atropine. However, if the eye has any visual potential intraocular pressure should be controlled with topical pressure-lowering agents or cyclo-ablative procedures. Drainage procedures are of limited value. . 4.1.5 Macular oedema Macular oedema following central retinal vein occlusion results from leakage of perifoveal capillaries. It results in visual loss but there is no proven treatment for this condition. Randomised controlled trials have failed to indicate benefit from grid treatment, although a trend in favour of treatment has been observed in younger patients.32 Although there was significant reduction in the severity of macular oedema in treated eyes compared to controls there was no visual acuity benefit. . 4.2 Recommendations for Further Follow-up Follow-up after 6 months for ischaemia (> 10DD non-perfusion) should be every 3 months for 1 year. Non ischaemic eyes should have initial follow up every 3 months for 6 months. Subsequent follow-up for all patients will depend upon laser treatment and complications but will not normally be required after 2 years in uncomplicated cases. The development of disc collaterals +/- resolution of the CRVO should lead to discharge from clinical supervision. . Experimental treatments Chorio-retinal anastomosis is an experimental treatment and the results of randomised trials of this therapy are awaited. However, there are significant complications associated with laser-assisted chorioretinal venous anastomosis eg choroidal neovascularisation33, retinal and subretinal fibrosis or traction34,and vitreous haemorrhage.35 . Trials of other treatments such as radial optic neurotomy with pars plana vitrectomy, and thrombolytic therapies are under way. These, however, are only experimental at present and are, therefore, not recommended except as part of clinical trials. |
|||||||||||||
|